All research
Thesis
Scaffolding
First-Person Voice
Parasocial Bonding
Neurochemistry

The Immersion Engine of Explicit Romance

The foundational thesis: how scaffolding, first-person voice, and parasocial bonding combine into a four-stage machine that bonds readers to fictional characters and keeps that bond paying out.

19 min read

Abstract

Modern erotic fiction functions as an immersion engine, a system engineered to bond the reader to fictional characters and to keep that bond paying out.

The publishing industry combines the plot-as-scaffolding structure with first-person narration to manufacture parasocial bonds between reader and protagonist, and those bonds sustain compulsive consumption through a neurochemical loop that pairs dopamine-driven anticipation with oxytocin-driven attachment.

Scaffolding times the release of reward to maximize anticipation. First-person voice collapses the distance between reader and character, so anticipation is lived rather than observed. The resulting intimacy produces a parasocial bond the brain processes as a real relationship, and the reward loop that holds it in place strengthens toward dependence with repetition. Read together, the evidence describes a single self-reinforcing cycle of craving, immersion, attachment, and return.

Modern erotic fiction is not a story that happens to arouse. It is a delivery system engineered to bond.

The publishing industry pairs the plot-as-scaffolding structure with first-person voice to manufacture parasocial bonds between reader and character, and those bonds drive compulsive consumption through a measurable neurochemical loop, a dopamine drip of anticipation locked to an oxytocin release of attachment. The three techniques are not independent stylistic choices. They are one integrated machine.

  1. Scaffolding controls the timing of reward
  2. First-person voice dissolves the distance between reader and character
  3. Parasocial bonding converts that fused, well-timed experience into a relationship the reader cannot walk away from

The evidence spans four domains:

  1. The stated intent of authors, editors, and publishers
  2. The psychology of narrative transportation and identification
  3. The science of parasocial attachment
  4. The neurobiology of reward and bonding

Read together, they describe a coherent mechanism. Each section traces one component, and the final section closes the loop, showing how the components compound into a self-reinforcing cycle of craving, immersion, attachment, and return.

The Integrated Mechanism

The machine runs in four stages, each enabling the next.

  1. First, scaffolding sets the tempo. The plot exists to organize sexual and emotional payoff, spacing release behind anticipation so the reader is held in a sustained state of wanting.
  2. Second, first-person voice removes the observer. By routing the narrative through the pronoun "I," the text collapses the reader into the protagonist's sensory and emotional position, so the anticipation is not watched but lived.
  3. Third, that lived, repeated, emotionally intimate experience produces a parasocial bond, a one-sided relationship the reader's brain processes with the same circuitry it uses for real people.
  4. Fourth, the bond is neurochemically anchored. Anticipation drives dopamine, intimacy and attachment drive oxytocin, and the pairing produces a reward combination rarely available in ordinary life. The reader returns not merely for the next story but for the next dose of the relationship.

Every later section supports one stage of this chain. The order is deliberate, because each stage depends on the one before it.

The Scaffolding Paradigm: Plot as a Timing Device for Reward

The industry openly describes plot in erotic fiction as a structural support for sexual content rather than an end in itself. When practitioners explain their own craft, they describe a tool for pacing reward, not a vehicle for story.

Jericho Writers, a major author-services authority, states the inversion plainly. Romance novels "have the sex scenes revolve around the plot," whereas erotic fiction "has the plot revolve around the sex scenes," and the writer's job is to "thread each sex scene together with a plausible storyline" 1. The author Christian Baines is blunter still, stating that erotica's "primary purpose is to turn you on" and that "the plot is there to get you from one sex scene to the next" 2. Professional craft instruction uses the load-bearing metaphor directly. One widely cited guide describes the best erotica as "built on a scaffolding of tension and release," where the plot "supports the emotional and sensual elements of the story" 3.

This is not the confession of a few authors. It is an editorial mandate. Tina Engler, founder of the pioneering digital erotic-romance house Ellora's Cave, defended the romance framework as the necessary container for the explicit content, comparing a plotless erotic novel to "leaving the plot of the murder mystery out of the mystery" 4. The container matters because it controls timing. A guaranteed happy ending and a rising line of conflict are not narrative decoration. They are the apparatus that delays gratification and therefore intensifies it.

The reason the delay works is the deepest principle in the genre's craft literature. Anticipation, not consummation, is the active ingredient. Writing instructors teach this explicitly. "Anticipation is the most powerful aphrodisiac," one maxim runs; "the longer the chase, the bigger the payoff." Guides for new authors warn against jumping to the act and instruct writers to build through "lingering glances, accidental touches, flirtatious banter, near-misses and interruptions" 4. The scaffolding is the mechanism that manufactures the chase. Its sole function is to stretch the interval between desire and release, because the interval is where the reward chemistry is generated, as the neurobiology section will show.

Scaffolding Industrialized: Trope-first Acquisition and Engineered Serialization

The timing logic now operates at industrial scale, built into how books are acquired and how platforms are designed. Contemporary publishing assembles the scaffolding before the book exists. Editors acquire to a pre-identified market, building metadata around tropes from the moment of acquisition. Libby McGuire, senior vice president and publisher at Atria, described reading a submission and thinking, "we know this reader; we know where to find them on TikTok" 5. Liz Pelletier, the Entangled Publishing chief executive behind Fourth Wing, operates on the principle that "if you put the reader first, you'll always succeed," test-marketing titles and tuning materials to engagement before release 6. Trope-forward acquisition reduces a novel to a bundle of pre-sold reward triggers: enemies-to-lovers, forced proximity, reverse harem, a guaranteed heat level. The scaffolding is specified like a product requirement.

Serialized pay-per-chapter platforms expose the timing logic in its purest form, because there the scaffolding is fused directly to a payment mechanism. Industry analysis describes the core "cliffhanger-unlock loop" as a design that "deliberately borrows mobile gaming's compulsion mechanics," combining a free opening, a coin unlock at the cliffhanger, and enforced waits 7. The Galatea app pairs a deliberately obscured multi-tier coin system with time-gating that locks readers out. One user reported "waiting 20 hours for some of the stories just for 1 chapter, and it's killing me" 8. A Radish reader described "an unhealthy addiction" driven by cliffhangers, "going broke because I couldn't stop reading" 9. Fractionalized into sub-dollar unlocks, a single serialized novel can quietly cost a reader well over a hundred dollars 7. The plot is no longer merely a delay device for arousal. It is a delay device for payment, and the two are the same lever.

The scale of consumption these mechanisms produce confirms their grip. Among avid romance readers, 46.4 percent read at least one novel per week, and most finish a book within seven days 10. United States print romance sold roughly 51 million units in a single year, a 24 percent increase 10. Romantasy alone rose from 454 million to 610 million dollars in one year, growth of 34 percent 10. These are not the consumption patterns of a casual hobby. They are the throughput of a system tuned for volume.

First-Person Voice: Dissolving the Distance Between Reader and Character

First-person voice is the genre's distance-collapsing instrument, chosen deliberately to convert a reader who watches a protagonist into a reader who becomes one. The technique is the second stage of the machine. It ensures that the anticipation the scaffolding builds is experienced from the inside.

Practitioners describe the choice in exactly these terms. Reader and author discussions frame first person as "getting in the characters' heads," reporting what the protagonist is "feeling, hearing, touching, and smelling" 11. The publisher Harlequin teaches first person as a craft technique for manufacturing closeness, calling it "one way to create instant intimacy with your readers" 12. The editorial platform Reedsy calls intimacy "the biggest benefit of first person POV," producing the feeling that the story "is being told to you by a confidant" 13. The author Stacy Gold ties the effect to tense: first person in present tense feels "like you're living it yourself along with them" 14. The aim is consistent across the industry, to remove the pane of glass between reader and character.

The psychology of why this works is well established in peer-reviewed media research, and it names two mechanisms the genre exploits. The first is narrative transportation. In their foundational study, Green and Brock defined transportation as total absorption into a story, an "integrative melding of attention, imagery, and feelings" that produces "detachment from reality," and they demonstrated that transported readers adopt story-consistent beliefs and resist counter-argument 15. The second mechanism is identification. Cohen defined identification as the process by which audience members "assume the identity, goals, and perspective of a character," reaching a state in which "self and other are no longer differentiated" 16. First-person voice is the most direct grammatical trigger for both. Linguistic analysis finds that first person "signals by definition an internal perspective" and produces stronger baseline identification than other perspectives 17. Present tense compounds the effect, because the narrator's ignorance of the future matches the reader's own, fusing their temporal position 17.

The genre pushes the technique to its logical endpoint with the blank-slate protagonist, a deliberately under-described narrator built so the reader can occupy the role. The lineage is documented and direct. Bella Swan of Twilight is engineered as a near-empty vessel, "a blank slate so the reader can imagine themself in her place" 18. Fifty Shades of Grey, which began as Twilight fan fiction, inherited that template wholesale in Anastasia Steele and sold more than 150 million copies on it 19. Fan fiction formalizes the same design in the "Y/N" reader-insert convention, which advises writers to make a protagonist "as vague and general as possible so anyone reading can imagine it's actually them" 20. Minimal description is not thin characterization. It is engineered vacancy, a socket sized for the reader.

The market now enforces this formula as a baseline expectation, which is the clearest proof that the technique performs. First person has become "the predominant perspective in the genre," dominating bookstore shelves 21. Readers police it. They tell authors at signings, "I won't read this book of yours because it's in third person," and one author switched her work to comply 21. A reader's plain statement captures the mechanism the whole apparatus is built to produce: "When I read first person, I'm almost like, that's me. That's me in the book" 21.

The technique has a louder register. When the first-person "I" is performed aloud by a professional narrator, the distance the page collapses by grammar is collapsed further by an actual human voice in the reader's ear. Audiobook and audio-erotica narration are the fastest-growing edge of the genre, and they amplify every stage of this machine, routing the story through auditory, social, and reward circuitry the printed page never reaches. The companion paper traces that amplification in full: The Voice in Your Ear: Performed Audio as the Bond Amplifier 22.

Parasocial Bonding: The Relationship the Reader Cannot Leave

The fused, repeated, emotionally intimate experience that scaffolding and first-person voice create resolves into a parasocial bond, a one-sided relationship with a fictional character that the brain treats as real. This is the third stage of the machine and its commercial payload, because a reader bonded to a character does not finish a book and move on. The reader returns to the relationship.

The construct is old and well validated. Horton and Wohl named parasocial interaction in 1956, describing the "intimacy at a distance" a media figure offers, an attachment that is "extremely influential with, and satisfying for, the great numbers who willingly receive it" 23. Decades of research extended the construct fully to fictional characters and made it measurable. Parasocial bonds strengthen with repeated exposure and serve, like real relationships, to reduce uncertainty about another's feelings 24. Serialized fiction and long series are therefore not just more product. They are more exposure, and exposure is what deepens the bond.

The bond runs on the architecture of human attachment. Research applying adult attachment theory to fiction finds that stories offer "a rich simulation of interpersonal interactions, offering intimacy with far less risk of rejection," and that avoidant/anxious attachment readers form stronger parasocial bonds with characters 25. The character functions as a secure base that is always available, perfectly predictable, and incapable of rejecting the reader. The depth of the bond is exposed when it breaks. Studying viewers anticipating the loss of a favorite character, Cohen found their distress resembled the dissolution of a real relationship, scaled to the intensity of the parasocial bond and the viewer's attachment style 26. The companion study of the Friends finale found that the strength of the parasocial bond was the single best predictor of grief at the character's loss 27.

Romance reading converts these bonds into a documented cultural practice and a purchasing pattern. The "book boyfriend" is an openly named object of attachment, and reader surveys show the bond reshaping real life. In a poll of 2,000 romance readers, a majority reported becoming more selective about real partners after reading, and more than 40 percent said their actual partner shares qualities with a favorite literary hero 28. Reporting describes the book boyfriend as a standard of "emotional availability, deep loyalty, and devotion" against which real partners are measured 29. The "book hangover," a recognized withdrawal state after finishing a book, describes readers unable to move to a new story, "emotionally tied to the story and its characters," and searching for a replacement 30. Withdrawal and replacement-seeking are the signature of a dependency, and they are precisely what drives the reader back to the platform for the next title. In the performed-audio format the bond acquires a second, real-world target, the narrator whose voice the listener has invited into their head for hours. Listeners follow a favored narrator across books and authors, and the named "book boyfriend" gains an audible one, a living voice the listener can seek out again on demand 22.

The bond is not metaphorical. It is neural. Using functional MRI, Broom and Wagner found that lonely people process favorite fictional characters with the same brain regions used for real relationships, the social-cognition circuitry of the temporoparietal junction activating for the fictional as for the actual 31. The brain does not file these characters under fiction. It files them under people. The social surrogacy research explains why that matters: favored media genuinely supplies the experience of belonging and buffers against rejection and self-esteem threats 32. A character can do the work of a relationship. For the reader, the fictional partner is not a substitute for connection. It is connection, delivered without risk, and that is why it competes so effectively with the real thing.

The Neurochemical Engine: The Dopamine Drip and the Oxytocin Release

The bond is held in place by a measurable neurochemical loop, the dopamine drip of anticipation paired with the oxytocin release of attachment, and this loop is the final stage of the machine. The previous three stages exist to drive it. Scaffolding times the dopamine, first-person voice routes the experience through the reader's own bonding circuits, and the parasocial relationship is the oxytocin-anchored attachment the loop sustains.

The dopamine half explains why anticipation, not payoff, is the genre's active ingredient. Schultz's foundational work established that dopamine neurons fire for the prediction of reward, not its receipt, and that as a cue comes to predict reward the dopamine signal shifts forward onto the cue itself 33. The chase, not the consummation, is where the dopamine lives. Berridge's research sharpens the point. Dopamine mediates wanting, the motivational craving for a reward, as a system separable from liking, the pleasure of obtaining it 34. A genre optimized for anticipation is a genre optimized for wanting, the exact neural state that sustains compulsive pursuit. The reward-timing schedule intensifies it further. Variable and unpredictable reward produces greater striatal dopamine release than predictable reward of equal value, the mechanism that makes slot machines compulsive 35. Cliffhanger serialization is a variable-reward schedule applied to narrative, and the unresolved tension exploits a second effect. Suspenseful text activates the brain's prediction and social-cognition networks, while the Zeigarnik effect holds the unfinished story in working memory, an open loop demanding closure 36. The reader is left wanting, by design, at every chapter break.

The oxytocin half explains the bond the wanting attaches to. Zak's experiments demonstrated that emotionally engaging narrative causes measurable oxytocin release, and that the rise predicts empathy and subsequent generosity toward strangers 37. Narrative that raised oxytocin increased the influence of its message on real giving behavior 38. Oxytocin is the molecule of attachment, trust, and pair-bonding, necessary in animal models such as the prairie vole for the formation of the bond itself 39. A first-person erotic narrative supplies the precise stimulus this system responds to: an emotional arc experienced from inside the character, repeated across hundreds of pages of intimate access. The genre co-activates the dopamine novelty circuit and the oxytocin bonding circuit at once, a pairing rare in ordinary life, which is what gives the experience its singular pull. A performed narration raises both halves of the loop on a single channel. Auditory anticipation releases dopamine in two distinct phases, the caudate during the build and the nucleus accumbens at the peak 40, while the human voice releases oxytocin directly: a mother's voice alone raises oxytocin in stressed children at levels comparable to physical touch 41. The molecule of attachment is releasable by the voice itself, and a narrator supplies exactly that stimulus, sustained for hours, straight into the ear. The companion paper develops this amplification in full 22.

Repetition recalibrates the brain toward dependence. High-frequency consumption of explicit sexual media is associated with measurable change in the reward system. Kühn and Gallinat found that more hours of consumption correlated with smaller gray-matter volume in the right striatum and weaker connectivity between the striatum and the prefrontal cortex, the pattern of a reward system downregulating against overstimulation 42. Chronic reward exposure downregulates striatal D2 dopamine receptors, the substrate of tolerance, so the same stimulus delivers a diminishing return and escalation follows 43. The reader needs more, more often, or more extreme, to reach the level the loop once delivered freely. The escalation the genre's market exhibits, toward higher heat, darker tropes, and faster serialization, is the behavioral signature of that tolerance.

The Closed Loop

The four stages form a single self-reinforcing cycle.

  1. Scaffolding stretches the interval between desire and release, generating the anticipation that drives dopamine.
  2. First-person voice routes that anticipation through the reader's own perceptual and emotional circuitry, so the experience is lived rather than observed.
  3. The lived, repeated intimacy produces a parasocial bond the brain processes as a real relationship, anchored by oxytocin.
  4. Tolerance ensures the reader returns for more, and the serialized, trope-specified, first-person product is engineered and priced to meet that return.

Each stage feeds the next, and the cycle closes on a reader who is bonded, wanting, and coming back.

The industry's own words, the psychology of immersion, the science of attachment, and the neurobiology of reward converge on the same conclusion.

Modern erotic fiction is built, acquired, written, and sold as an immersion engine.

Its purpose is not to be read once. Its purpose is to bond the reader to a relationship that pays out in anticipation and attachment, and to keep that relationship running.

References

Footnotes

  1. Jericho Writers. "How to Write Erotica and a Damn Fine Sex Scene." https://jerichowriters.com/how-to-write-erotica-and-a-damn-fine-sex-scene/ ↩

  2. Lawrence, Ryan. "Interview with Queer Urban Fantasy/Horror Author Christian Baines." https://ryanlawrenceauthor.ca/interview-with-queer-urban-fantasy-horror-paranormal-romance-author-christian-baines/ ↩

  3. DIY MFA. "The Structure of Romance Writing." https://diymfa.com/writing/structure-romance-writing/ ↩

  4. "Integrated Clinical and Structural Analysis of Explicit Narrative Erotica," the companion document in docs/research/, summarizing industry statements from Ellora's Cave, Black Lace, and craft instructors. ↩ ↩2

  5. Libby McGuire (senior vice president and publisher, Atria), quoted in Slate, December 2022. https://slate.com/culture/2022/12/booktok-trope-sales-romance-fantasy-genre.html ↩

  6. Publishers Weekly. "PW's 2024 Person of the Year: Liz Pelletier." 2024. https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/awards-and-prizes/article/96732-pw-s-2024-person-of-the-year-liz-pelletier.html ↩

  7. Trends.vc. "Serialized Fiction Apps: Cliffhanger Economics, Rented Audience, Werewolf Formula." https://trends.vc/serialized-fiction-apps-cliffhanger-economics-rented-audience-werewolf-formula/ ↩ ↩2

  8. MakeHeadway. "Is Galatea App Safe? A Full 2026 Privacy and Safety Guide for Readers." https://makeheadway.com/blog/is-galatea-app-safe/ ↩

  9. ComplaintsBoard. "Radish Fiction Readers Reviews 2025." https://www.complaintsboard.com/radish-fiction-b148963 ↩

  10. Circana BookScan. "Another Year of Romance with a Dark Twist." June 2025. Circana (formerly NPD/Nielsen BookScan) is the standard source for United States print book sales. https://www.circana.com/post/another-year-of-romance-with-a-dark-twist-circana-bookscan-reports ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  11. Goodreads. "Why Do Erotica Authors Write in First Person So Much?" https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/2084508-why-do-erotica-authors-write-in-first-person-so-much ↩

  12. Write for Harlequin. "Voice 101: Getting Some Perspective on First and Third Person." https://www.writeforharlequin.com/voice-101-getting-some-perspective-on-first-and-third-person/ ↩

  13. Reedsy. "First Person Point of View." https://reedsy.com/blog/guide/point-of-view/first-person-pov/ ↩

  14. Gold, Stacy. "Romance in First vs. Third Person." https://stacygold.com/romance-in-first-vs-third-person/ ↩

  15. Green, Melanie C., and Timothy C. Brock. "The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79, no. 5 (2000): 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 ↩

  16. Cohen, Jonathan. "Defining Identification: A Theoretical Look at the Identification of Audiences with Media Characters." Mass Communication & Society 4, no. 3 (2001): 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01 ↩

  17. van Krieken, Kobie, Hans Hoeken, and José Sanders. "Evoking and Measuring Identification with Narrative Characters: A Linguistic Cues Framework." Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017): 1190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01190 ↩ ↩2

  18. Salve Regina University. "Twilight and the Appeal of Self-Insert Fiction" (Pell Scholars thesis). https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1094&context=pell_theses ↩

  19. "Fifty Shades." Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifty_Shades ↩

  20. Fanlore. "Reader-Insert." https://fanlore.org/wiki/Reader-Insert ↩

  21. Slate. "Why Are So Many Romance Novels in First Person and Not Third Person Now?" March 2026. https://slate.com/culture/2026/03/romance-books-novels-fantasy-romantasy-booktok-pov-first-person-third-person.html ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  22. "The Voice in Your Ear: Performed Audio as the Bond Amplifier," the companion document in docs/research/, on how professional narration intensifies parasocial bonding, dopamine, and oxytocin. </research/the-voice-in-your-ear-performed-audio> ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  23. Horton, Donald, and R. Richard Wohl. "Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction: Observations on Intimacy at a Distance." Psychiatry 19, no. 3 (1956): 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 ↩

  24. Perse, Elizabeth M., and Rebecca B. Rubin. "Attribution in Social and Parasocial Relationships." Communication Research 16, no. 1 (1989): 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365089016001003 ↩

  25. Rain, Marina, and Raymond A. Mar. "Adult Attachment and Engagement with Fictional Characters." Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 38, no. 9 (2021): 2792–2813. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211018513 ↩

  26. Cohen, Jonathan. "Parasocial Break-Up from Favorite Television Characters: Attachment Styles and Relationship Intensity." Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 21, no. 2 (2004): 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504041374 ↩

  27. Eyal, Keren, and Jonathan Cohen. "When Good Friends Say Goodbye: A Parasocial Breakup Study." Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 50, no. 3 (2006): 502–523. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem5003_9 ↩

  28. ThriftBooks and OnePoll. "America's Favorite Book Boyfriend" (survey of 2,000 readers). 2024. https://www.thriftbooks.com/blog/romance-real-life-onepoll-survey/ ↩

  29. The Washington Post. "What's a Book Boyfriend?" June 2025. https://www.washingtonpost.com/books/2025/06/21/book-boyfriend-romance-novels/ ↩

  30. Holley, Megan. "What Is a Book Hangover? Signs You're Experiencing It and How to Overcome It." https://meganholleyauthor.com/blog/what-is-a-book-hangover-signs-youre-experiencing-it-and-how-to-overcome-it/ ↩

  31. Broom, Timothy W., and Dylan D. Wagner. "Fictional Characters Seem More Real to Lonely People" (functional MRI study). British Psychological Society Research Digest. https://www.bps.org.uk/research-digest/fictional-characters-seem-more-real-to-lonely-people ↩

  32. Derrick, Jaye L., Shira Gabriel, and Kurt Hugenberg. "Social Surrogacy: How Favored Television Programs Provide the Experience of Belonging." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45, no. 2 (2009): 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.016 ↩

  33. Schultz, Wolfram. "Dopamine Reward Prediction Error Coding." Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 18, no. 1 (2016): 23–32. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2016.18.1/wschultz See also Schultz, Wolfram, Peter Dayan, and P. Read Montague. "A Neural Substrate of Prediction and Reward." Science 275, no. 5306 (1997): 1593–1599. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 ↩

  34. Berridge, Kent C., and Terry E. Robinson. "Liking, Wanting, and the Incentive-Sensitization Theory of Addiction." American Psychologist 71, no. 8 (2016): 670–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000059 ↩

  35. Zald, David H., et al. "Dopamine Transmission in the Human Striatum During Monetary Reward Tasks." Journal of Neuroscience 24, no. 17 (2004): 4105–4112. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4643-03.2004 ↩

  36. Lehne, Moritz, et al. "Reading a Suspenseful Literary Text Activates Brain Areas Related to Social Cognition and Predictive Inference." PLOS ONE 10, no. 5 (2015): e0124550. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124550 ↩

  37. Barraza, Jorge A., and Paul J. Zak. "Empathy Toward Strangers Triggers Oxytocin Release and Subsequent Generosity." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1167 (2009): 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04504.x ↩

  38. Lin, Ping-Ying, Naomi S. Grewal, Christophe Morin, Walter D. Johnson, and Paul J. Zak. "Oxytocin Increases the Influence of Public Service Advertisements." PLOS ONE 8, no. 2 (2013): e56934. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056934 ↩

  39. Young, Larry J., and Zuoxin Wang. "The Neurobiology of Pair Bonding." Nature Neuroscience 7, no. 10 (2004): 1048–1054. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1327 ↩

  40. Salimpoor, Valorie N., Mitchel Benovoy, Kevin Larcher, Alain Dagher, and Robert J. Zatorre. "Anatomically Distinct Dopamine Release During Anticipation and Experience of Peak Emotion to Music." Nature Neuroscience 14, no. 2 (2011): 257-262. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2726 ↩

  41. Seltzer, Leslie J., Toni E. Ziegler, and Seth D. Pollak. "Social Vocalizations Can Release Oxytocin in Humans." Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277, no. 1694 (2010): 2661-2666. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0567 ↩

  42. Kühn, Simone, and Jürgen Gallinat. "Brain Structure and Functional Connectivity Associated with Pornography Consumption: The Brain on Porn." JAMA Psychiatry 71, no. 7 (2014): 827–834. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.93 ↩

  43. Volkow, Nora D., Joanna S. Fowler, Gene-Jack Wang, Ruben Baler, and Frank Telang. "Imaging Dopamine's Role in Drug Abuse and Addiction." Neuropharmacology 56, supplement 1 (2009): 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.05.022 ↩

Back to all research